2025
[Open Call - 2nd Conference The Future Design of Streets]
Poster Submission
[Open Call - 2nd Conference The Future Design of Streets]
Poster Submission
2024
[Cycle of Debates Architecture and Art in the (Re)Construction of Urban Place]
[Cycle of Debates Architecture and Art in the (Re)Construction of Urban Place]
©TOPOTEK1. Parque Urbano Superkilen (Copenhaga, Dinamarca).
Projeto de regeneraçáo urbana da autoria de: Topotek1, BIG–Bjarke Ingels Group e Superflex Studio, 2008-2012.
Projeto de regeneraçáo urbana da autoria de: Topotek1, BIG–Bjarke Ingels Group e Superflex Studio, 2008-2012.
_____________________________
CICLO DE DEBATES | OUT.DEZ.2024
ARQUITETURA E ARTE NA (RE)CONSTRUÇÃO DO LUGAR URBANO
CICLO DE DEBATES | OUT.DEZ.2024
ARQUITETURA E ARTE NA (RE)CONSTRUÇÃO DO LUGAR URBANO
.SESSÃO 1 | FAUP, Porto [15.10.2024 – 18h30]
“INTEGRAR DIÁLOGOS, AUSCULTAR POTENCIALIDADES”
.SESSÃO 2 | CAAA, Guimarães [07.11.2024 – 18h30]
“CENTROS URBANOS: CONECTANDO MEMÓRIA, USOS E SIGNIFICADO”
.SESSÃO 3 | ZETGALLERY, Braga [09.11.2024 – 16h30]
“SENTIR O CONTEXTO, CONSTRUIR A CIDADE, MODELAR A IDENTIDADE”
.SESSÃO 4 | FAUP, Porto [03.12.2024 – 18h30]
“A CIDADE SISTÉMICA: TERRITÓRIOS DO FUTURO, CAMINHOS DO PASSADO”
SINOPSE
ARQUITETURA E ARTE NA (RE)CONSTRUÇÃO DO LUGAR URBANO é um Ciclo de Debates que promove um momento de reflexão pública e coletiva em torno dos processos contemporâneos de produção espacial do urbano. A partir de uma aproximação à prática de profissionais com diferentes experiências em processos de produção do ambiente construído, propomos, entre Outubro e Dezembro 2024, quatro diferentes painéis de discussão com subtemas. Em cada sessão tentaremos, compreender a multidimensional realidade urbana, ativando um diálogo interdisciplinar entre os diversos atores que contribuem para a conceção e materialização do espaço público (arquitetos, paisagistas, designers, artistas, decisores públicos, curadores, investigadores…), tentando estabelecer uma ponte entre as disciplinas criativas da Arquitetura e da Arte, como potencial resposta aos desafios da cidade contemporânea. Em conjunto, tentaremos mapear os objetivos, propósitos e interesses de diferentes escalas de atuação nos processos de produção de várias cidades, com o intuito de indagar como devemos, Hoje, pensar a nossa complexa realidade, com vista a uma mais significante, integrada e humanizada evolução do senso de lugar urbano.
Este Ciclo de Debates está enquadrado na investigação desenvolvida por Inês Osório (Bolseira FCT) no âmbito do Programa de Doutoramento em Arquitetura, Dinâmicas e Formas Urbanas, na FAUP, filiada ao grupo de investigação “Morfologias e Dinâmicas do Território” do Centro de Estudos de Arquitetura e Urbanismo (MDT/CEAU-FAUP).
INVESTIGAÇÃO, ORGANIZAÇÃO E MODERAÇÃO
Inês Osório
APOIO INSTITUICIONAL
FAUP
CEAU
CAAA
ZETgallery
Inês Osório
APOIO INSTITUICIONAL
FAUP
CEAU
CAAA
ZETgallery
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2023 [OPEN CALL - Scopio Magazine ARCHITECTURE, ART AND IMAGE]
2023 [OPEN CALL - Scopio Magazine ARCHITECTURE, ART AND IMAGE]
Article Publication on Scopio Magazine ARCHITECTURE, ART AND IMAGE - Volume 1
Sense of place: How should we think about urban planning practices today?"
by Inês Osório
LANDSCAPES OF CARE | Editor Maria Neto
Sense of place: How should we think about urban planning practices today?"
by Inês Osório
LANDSCAPES OF CARE | Editor Maria Neto
ABSTRACT
Considering the recent socio-technological, psychosocial, political, and economic developments, will the urban planning practices (in the systemic sense of its exercise) be able to adapt to a growing, changing urban culture? Noting the diverse variety of contemporary spatial practices in which methods, concepts, and discourses tend to be sealed off from one another, this reflection calls for a reevaluation of the plurality dimensions and layers in the construction of the urban reality, questioning in this process, the predictable hegemony regarding the supremacy of Architecture in shaping modern and current urban imagery. This essay seeks to foster a reflection on new contemporary paradigms of Western urban life, tracing a retrospective view that allows us to look systemically at what we have built. In this process, the aim is to stimulate a future collision path, a conceptual and operational dialogue between the creative disciplines of Architecture and Contemporary Art on the current urbanization courses, proposing this possible relationship as an inseparable disciplinary set in the process of producing public space and urban territory. Putting forth the hypothesis of reassessing the established models of contemporary urban planning, the goal is to explore the possible operationality of the bauhausian canon in its historical disciplinary triad (architecture/art/design) while, in a process of symbiotic interaction, considering them as complementary tools in urban design concept, promoting a pluralistic and expanded dialogue between the processes of designing, requalifying, and resignifying the future places.
Considering the recent socio-technological, psychosocial, political, and economic developments, will the urban planning practices (in the systemic sense of its exercise) be able to adapt to a growing, changing urban culture? Noting the diverse variety of contemporary spatial practices in which methods, concepts, and discourses tend to be sealed off from one another, this reflection calls for a reevaluation of the plurality dimensions and layers in the construction of the urban reality, questioning in this process, the predictable hegemony regarding the supremacy of Architecture in shaping modern and current urban imagery. This essay seeks to foster a reflection on new contemporary paradigms of Western urban life, tracing a retrospective view that allows us to look systemically at what we have built. In this process, the aim is to stimulate a future collision path, a conceptual and operational dialogue between the creative disciplines of Architecture and Contemporary Art on the current urbanization courses, proposing this possible relationship as an inseparable disciplinary set in the process of producing public space and urban territory. Putting forth the hypothesis of reassessing the established models of contemporary urban planning, the goal is to explore the possible operationality of the bauhausian canon in its historical disciplinary triad (architecture/art/design) while, in a process of symbiotic interaction, considering them as complementary tools in urban design concept, promoting a pluralistic and expanded dialogue between the processes of designing, requalifying, and resignifying the future places.
CITATION
Osório, Inês. "Sense of place: How should we think about urban planning practices today?." SCOPIO MAGAZINE ARCHITECTURE, ART AND IMAGE 1.1 (2023): 66-83.. https://doi.org/10.24840/1647-8274_2023-0001_0001_188
Osório, Inês. "Sense of place: How should we think about urban planning practices today?." SCOPIO MAGAZINE ARCHITECTURE, ART AND IMAGE 1.1 (2023): 66-83.. https://doi.org/10.24840/1647-8274_2023-0001_0001_188